Cutting out the Latin

I'm away on holiday for a week from tomorrow, so no posting or replies to comments over that time. See you when I get back!

So, I wrote before on improving academic writing, and I said that I generally found that cutting out Latin improved my writing. To that end, here's a rough list of phrases that I tend to find work as replacements. I'm no expert on this, and the list is just what I personally find helpful. To that end, comments on advisable changes or helpful additions are welcome.

It's also worth noting that a slightly ammended list might be useful for students as a glossary when reading.

---

a fortiori - "all the more so".

a posteriori - "from experience".

a priori - "not from experience".

ad hoc - "arbitrary" sometimes works, but I generally leave this as is.

ceteris paribus - "all else being equal".

ex hypothesi - "by hypothesis".

inter alia - "amongst other things".

mutatis mutandis - "if the necessary changes were made", though this isn't always entirely clear.

non sequitur - "doesn't follow".

pace - "with due respect to" is sometimes ok, but I more often just replace it with the more generic "c.f.".

per se - "as such".

prima facie - "appears" is often better than "at first glance", though the latter is more literal.

pro tanto - "contributory", or prefix it with "some".

reductio ad absurdum - "entails a contradiction" (or less strongly: "entails X. X is implausible.")

sine qua non - "essence" usually works, though might be misleading in some (metaphysical) contexts.

Sui generis - "of its own kind", "irreducible".

verbatim - "word for word".

vice versa - "conversely" usually works, though "vice versa" is itself fairly readable.

Anything with respect to references (ob cit, passim, etc.) I tend to remove entirely, giving the reference each time. Possibly some journals will not approve of this.

I tend to leave "de facto", "de jure", "de re", and "de dicto" as they are. Any suggested replacements?

There must be some common phrases I've missed?